Re: MD how do intellectual patterns respond to Quality?

From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Sat Jul 30 2005 - 06:46:34 BST

  • Next message: MarshaV: "Re: MD RE: Population"

    Dear Sam,

    You asked 25 Jul 10:19 +0100:
    "what is the equivalent way [referring to other levels] of understanding the
    intellectual level? ... how do those intellectual patterns respond to DQ?
    ... How is the higher quality of one intellectual pattern over another
    static latched?"

    To understand the 'natural selection' of intellectual patterns, it is
    essential to understand what the smallest unit of 'patternedness' at the
    intellectual level is. Not an idea, but a symbol.
    It is latched because and as long as it is used to 'refer'. Intellectual
    quality is the 'truth' or 'meaning' experienced in references of symbols to
    ... whatever.
    'Succes' in this 'natural selection' is NOT measured by the strength with
    which individuals (in their heads) stick to a particular symbol. For
    individuals die and the symbols in their head will be gone.
    Symbols are latched in groups. (And the social patterns of value have as
    smallest unit habits that are passed on by copying behaviour. Social
    patterns constitute groups, but also
    identities-as-roles-in-a-social-structure. Groups are not the defining
    element of the social level. But that is another story.) In that sense
    intellectual patterns require a social level to come into existence and to
    survive.
    'Succes' in the 'natural selection of symbols' is measured by the size of
    the group that expresses 'truth' or 'meaning' by refering with them to ...
    whatever and by the duration of their use.
    An idea (a set of symbols) dies when people stop expressing it. It will
    exist for some time as a 'seed', as hieroglyphs on stone or words on paper,
    but when its social context (eg. language-as-habits-of-communication)
    changes, it will lose its ability to 'refer', to express 'truth' or
    'meaning'.
    'Value' and 'quality', at any level, are NOT 'exercition of preference' by
    some unit of decision. That understanding of 'value' and 'quality' refers to
    subject object metaphysics: subjects exercising preference for objects over
    other objects.
    'Intellectual' or rather 'symbolic' 'value/quality' are symply implied in
    the existence (stability and versatility) of patternedness in the way we
    'refer' and experience 'truth' and 'meaning'.

    With friendly greetings,

    Wim

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jul 30 2005 - 07:04:13 BST