From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Sun Aug 07 2005 - 15:28:33 BST
Hi Wim,
A late reply on this one. You said:
> To understand the 'natural selection' of intellectual patterns, it is
> essential to understand what the smallest unit of 'patternedness' at the
> intellectual level is. Not an idea, but a symbol.
> It is latched because and as long as it is used to 'refer'. Intellectual
> quality is the 'truth' or 'meaning' experienced in references of symbols
> to
> ... whatever.
> 'Succes' in this 'natural selection' is NOT measured by the strength with
> which individuals (in their heads) stick to a particular symbol.
<snip>
> 'Intellectual' or rather 'symbolic' 'value/quality' are symply implied in
> the existence (stability and versatility) of patternedness in the way we
> 'refer' and experience 'truth' and 'meaning'.
Thing is, I see 'symbol' as a social level phenomenon. There is no such
thing as a private language. So I agree with what you say about symbols, I
just think it refers to the social level, not the fourth level.
Regards
Sam
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 07 2005 - 17:11:14 BST