Re: MD MOQ: Involved or on the Sideline?

From: ian glendinning (psybertron@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Aug 07 2005 - 06:52:46 BST

  • Next message: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD DQ and DM's thesis of the '4 -realms of SQ'"

    MSH / Scott

    Just posted this on another thread, RMP said in ZMM ....
    'My personal feeling is that this is how any further improvement of
    the world will be done: by individuals making Quality decisions and
    that's all. God, I don't want to have any more enthusiasm for big
    programs full of social planning for big masses of people that leave
    individual Quality out. These can be left alone for a while. There's a
    place for them but they've got to be built on a foundation of Quality
    within the individuals involved"

    I support "leaving the big issues alone for a while"
    And like Scott I do not consider that passive acceptance, just an
    alternative approach (one more likely to achieve progress than
    attracting bulls to red-rags).

    Ian

    On 8/7/05, Scott Roberts <jse885@cox.net> wrote:
    > Mark SH,
    >
    > You don't seem to be realizing that I am not disputing your political
    > arguments. I don't agree with all of them, but I'm not inclined to engage in
    > argument over them. So let's cut to the personal stuff.
    >
    > msh:
    > Your point about a good standard of living is interesting. The
    > problem is that this good standard comes at the expense of most of
    > the world's population. The fact that the people enjoying the good
    > standard are unaware of this says a lot about the domination of
    > information in this country, and a lot about the people who are not
    > so ill-informed but who nevertheless remain silent.
    >
    > And, BTW, how does this infatuation with consumerism square with your
    > ideas about driving away one's ego? Just curious.
    >
    > Scott:
    > I think excessive consumerism is bad. But the excessive consumers are going
    > to have to realize that for themselves.
    >
    > scott prev:
    > So if you really want to defeat all those imperialists, encourage
    > people to be true Christians and Buddhists, simple-living
    > enthusiasts, and so forth.
    >
    > msh 08-06-05:
    > That might help, as long as they act rather than self-immolate or sit
    > around waiting for Judgement Day. Why not just encourage them to get
    > in touch with their own sense of humanity?
    >
    > Scott:
    > That's what Christianity and Buddhism (and other religions) teach. How well
    > it is received is another matter.
    >
    > scott prev:
    > Now if you object that by that reasoning, no one could act at all, I
    > agree. That is why I am not political. I do not know how Giants
    > should be run. I'd rather encourage people to work on their own
    > intellect so that gradually the Giant will wither away.
    >
    > msh 08-06-05:
    > And, as I said before, that's fine for you, enjoying your good
    > standard of living while you wait. In the meantime, millions are
    > suffering as a direct result of policies instituted by our
    > government, in our name and, if we are silent, with our tacit
    > approval.
    >
    > Scott:
    > Silence is silence. It is not tacit approval. To take it as tacit approval
    > is to say you insist on working out the intellectual/social conflict your
    > way. I am playing a different game, in part because I see your game as
    > conceding too much to the social from the start.
    >
    > msh 08-06-05:
    > Well, I don't see how criticizing people who act, saying they are
    > merely ego-bound and therefore making things worse (especially when
    > there is plenty of evidence to indicate positive results), can be
    > interpreted as anything other than ego-bound criticism. Sorry.
    >
    > Scott:
    > I haven't said that you are making things worse, nor am I criticizing
    > activists per se. My original point in this thread was to object to your
    > accusing me and others who do not do what you do of "doing nothing". You
    > seem to be wedded to that old New Left slogan, "If you're not part of the
    > solution, you're part of the problem", where, of course, you are defining
    > what counts as the problem and the solution. I see what I am doing as a
    > different kind of solution to social ills. We diagnose the problem
    > differently, and hence have different solutions.
    >
    > - Scott
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 07 2005 - 07:22:14 BST