Re: MD DQ and DM's thesis of the '4 -realms of SQ'

From: Scott Roberts (jse885@cox.net)
Date: Sun Aug 07 2005 - 07:19:25 BST

  • Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Self-Evident MoQ Truths"

    David M,

    DM: correction is correct, you're on the ball. Explain more by what you
    mean by language prior to intellect. Does langauge begin with memory?
    I think of archetypes as a sort of language and these as being forms of
    SQ that the i-realm accesses in re-sponse to the p-realm, a form of
    SQ with powerful emotional quality aspects.

    Scott:
    Well, I've got to be careful, since in my own metaphysics I regard language
    as fundamental, that everything is language, manifesting intellect. So when
    I say "language prior to intellect", I am referring to the temporal period
    before intellect as the MOQ understands it, that is, before about 500 BC.
    There was language then, but not intellect within the individual human
    being. Of course, the MOQ says there was just no intellect period, while my
    view is that it existed, just wasn't internalized. Humans perceived it
    outside of themselves, and called it gods. Now we have to hypothesize
    non-i-realm intellect, calling it, e.g., archetypes.

    Then there is another twist to this of relevance when ordering the levels
    when one considers that space and time are products of consciousness, but
    that's another story.

    - Scott

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 07 2005 - 08:00:08 BST