From: Scott Roberts (jse885@cox.net)
Date: Sun Aug 07 2005 - 07:19:25 BST
David M,
DM: correction is correct, you're on the ball. Explain more by what you
mean by language prior to intellect. Does langauge begin with memory?
I think of archetypes as a sort of language and these as being forms of
SQ that the i-realm accesses in re-sponse to the p-realm, a form of
SQ with powerful emotional quality aspects.
Scott:
Well, I've got to be careful, since in my own metaphysics I regard language
as fundamental, that everything is language, manifesting intellect. So when
I say "language prior to intellect", I am referring to the temporal period
before intellect as the MOQ understands it, that is, before about 500 BC.
There was language then, but not intellect within the individual human
being. Of course, the MOQ says there was just no intellect period, while my
view is that it existed, just wasn't internalized. Humans perceived it
outside of themselves, and called it gods. Now we have to hypothesize
non-i-realm intellect, calling it, e.g., archetypes.
Then there is another twist to this of relevance when ordering the levels
when one considers that space and time are products of consciousness, but
that's another story.
- Scott
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 07 2005 - 08:00:08 BST