Re: MD Enlightenment or Revelation

From: Kevin Perez (juan825diego@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Aug 08 2005 - 11:15:47 BST

  • Next message: Sam Norton: "Re: MD Lila-24"

    Thanks for the kind response Platt.

    You ask,

    > Is it kosher to compare DQ with spirit? Can a
    response to DQ be considered
    > a religious/mystic-like experience? Or vice-versa?
    I think so.

    I do too.

    Spirituality is a word near and dear to my heart. The
    following words are
    from the late Henri Nouwen. "To live a spiritual life
    we must first find
    the courage to enter into the desert of loneliness and
    to change it by
    gentle and persistent efforts into a garden of
    solitude."

    And the following words are attributed to the Dalai
    Lama by Richard Rohr.
    "If you can possibly avoid a spiritual path, by all
    means do so! It will
    take your whole life away."
    <http://www.cacradicalgrace.org/getconnected/Papacy_printfriendly.html>.

    Spirituality's defining characteristic is
    transformation. Pirsig seems to
    be saying the same thing about Dynamic Quality.

    Kevin Perez

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Platt Holden" <pholden@sc.rr.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>;
    <owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk>
    Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 6:13 PM
    Subject: Re: MD Enlightenment or Revelation

    > Hello Kevin,
    >
    > An excellent response to my query about the
    difference between mystic
    > enlightenment and born again revelation. Thanks very
    much for your
    > comments as well as your links to revealing web
    sites. I found this
    > passage from your post especially significant:
    >
    >> Sometime in the late 80s I had the pleasure of
    >> attending a conference at the
    >> Yale Divinity School in which Fr. Thomas Keating
    (RC)
    >> and Sri Sri Ravi
    >> Shankar (Hindu) shared there thoughts and feelings
    on
    >> prayer and mysticism.
    >> I remember feeling that I had witnessed (no pun
    >> intended) something
    >> remarkable. Here were these two giants from
    radically
    >> different mystical
    >> traditions agreeing on so much. Except for the
    >> language, there appeard to
    >> be no difference in what they were saying.
    >
    > I've always felt that if you strip away all the
    verbiage, claptrap and
    > churchy stuff that surrounds both Eastern and
    Western religions that in
    > essence what are called religious experiences and
    mystic experiences would
    > be so similar as to be nearly
    indistinguishable.That's why I felt a sudden
    > embrace of disparate ideas when Pirsig quoted
    Northrop near the end of the
    > SODV paper:
    >
    > "Northrop's name for Dynamic Quality is 'the
    undifferentiated aesthetic
    > continuum.' By 'continuum' he means that it goes on
    and on forever. By
    > 'undifferentiated' he means that it is without
    conceptual distinctions.
    > And by 'aesthetic' he means that it has quality."
    >
    > I think an understanding of the "undifferentiated
    aesthetic continuum" is
    > what Thomas Keating and Sri Sri Ravi were sharing at
    the conference you
    > described. It is the same understanding, as Pirsig
    says, that is shared
    > between science and art.
    >
    > Contacting this higher spiritual-like realm where DQ
    resides happens to me
    > (if it happens at all ) from sudden exposure to
    exquisite beauty, whether
    > a landscape, a work of art, or an elegant woman. But
    I can see where
    > others make contact by fixing a motorcycle, sweeping
    a floor, or kneeling
    > in prayer. In fact, I know of no limits to joining
    with spirit except
    > those imposed by either outside strictures (that you
    described so well in
    > your post) or an ultra rational-materialist mindset.
    >
    > Is it kosher to compare DQ with spirit? Can a
    response to DQ be considered
    > a religious/mystic-like experience? Or vice-versa?
    I think so.
    >
    > What do you think?
    >
    > Best,
    > Platt
    >
    >
    >
    > Thanks again, Kevin. I hope others will share their
    views on this subject.
    >
    > Best,
    > Platt

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail.yahoo.com

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 08 2005 - 11:37:49 BST