Re: MD Self-Evident MoQ Truths

From: ian glendinning (psybertron@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 10 2005 - 00:58:22 BST

  • Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Mythos: the lyre"

    So thanks Scott, you make my point.

    People who wave DQ about are on the MoQ side of that line in the sand.
    People who wave God about are on the other.
    Dead simple.

    A decision on which is better or worse (DQ or God) is a matter of
    choosing which side of that line.

    Ian

    On 8/9/05, Scott Roberts <jse885@cox.net> wrote:
    > Ian,
    >
    > Ian said:
    > Atheistic / Non-Theistic ? I feel it is explicit that MoQ does not
    > "require" god as part of its explanation, there are no gaps waiting to
    > be filled
    >
    > Scott:
    > I fail to see how the MOQ has no gaps waiting to be filled. Doesn't it just
    > wave "DQ" at the question of how the universe gets from one level to
    > another? I don't see this as any better (or worse) an explanation than
    > saying "God did it".
    >
    > - Scott
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 10 2005 - 01:37:44 BST