Re: MD Why Platt must stay

From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Sun Aug 14 2005 - 15:13:37 BST

Next message: ian glendinning: "MD WORLDS WORST APOLOGY"

Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Sam's Eudaimonia"

Previous message: David Harding: "Re: MD The MOQ in Hollywood"
Maybe in reply to: Sam Norton: "MD Why Platt must stay"
Next in thread: Ant McWatt: "MD Why Platt, Sam, Matt K, Scott and Erin must go"
Reply: Ant McWatt: "MD Why Platt, Sam, Matt K, Scott and Erin must go"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Steve,

> Sam wrote:
> ___________________
>
> Discussing world politics is safe and abstract. Our own egos are rarely at
> stake.
> __________________
>
> No Sam. Egos are definitely (perceived to be) at stake. That is the crux
> of it. The individual identifies with his or her viewpoint. A threat to
> that viewpoint is seen as a threat to the ego. That is what generates the
> fireworks (passion).

You're right. I should have said 'lives'.

Sam

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: ian glendinning: "MD WORLDS WORST APOLOGY"
Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Sam's Eudaimonia"
Previous message: David Harding: "Re: MD The MOQ in Hollywood"
Maybe in reply to: Sam Norton: "MD Why Platt must stay"
Next in thread: Ant McWatt: "MD Why Platt, Sam, Matt K, Scott and Erin must go"
Reply: Ant McWatt: "MD Why Platt, Sam, Matt K, Scott and Erin must go"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 15 2005 - 03:08:30 BST