From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Tue Aug 16 2005 - 12:50:01 BST
Hi CL,
>>On a forum like this I guess I think it would be nice if there were some
simple definitions for words like "mainstream"--ie (are we talking W and
Billy Graham or the Pope and Methodists but not Unitarians?). Some line
drawn between the two based on lineage or popularity? Or literal vs
figurative interpretations. Is mainstream the masses or the churches?
If we got an agreement, I'd run with it, but I wouldn't expect it very soon.
All I can do is (try and) be consistent in my own usage. Whereby
'mainstream' = the orthodox tradition, from the beginning, still numerically
largest; and something else ('Modern Protestant' perhaps?) to refer to the
more recent forms. My perpetual gripe is that people reject the Modern
Protestant variety of Christianity and think they've rejected Christianity
as a whole. Which they haven't - and they often end up with positions
remarkably close to the mainstream Christian tradition. Bill Hicks is one
example; have a look at the long quote which Ant provided recently.
By the way, I'm not sure I'd include 'unitarian' as Christian (I think
they're excluded from all the ecumenical bodies as they deny the Trinity).
Sam
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 16 2005 - 13:03:37 BST