From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Fri Aug 19 2005 - 08:42:17 BST
Hi David,
>
> DM: that's silly abuse. OK wise guys give us your wisdom.......
>
> How do conservative values support DQ & the evolution of SQ?????
I think Ant gave a perfect example (from Pirsig):
"It does tend to reveal Dynamic Quality by blocking static intellectual
patterns but you need those patterns to keep from harm. People on peyote go
walking in front of oncoming cars and get killed because they think they are
one with God and no harm can come to them. The static patterns that were
blocked would have prevented that. In the American Indian ritual a guard
who does not take peyote is posted outside the teepee to prevent anyone from
wandering off by himself. They know what can happen."
If you don't have the static patterns, you have degeneration and death. So
you need SQ for the DQ, just as you need DQ for the SQ to evolve.
So far as I understand it, 'conservatism' is pointing out the value of the
SQ.
Sam
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 19 2005 - 10:11:13 BST