From: MarshaV (marshalz@charter.net)
Date: Fri Aug 19 2005 - 11:13:30 BST
Sam,
It seems to me that both conservatism and liberalism have their fair share
of SQ.
Marsha
At 08:42 AM 8/19/2005 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi David,
>
>>
>>DM: that's silly abuse. OK wise guys give us your wisdom.......
>>
>>How do conservative values support DQ & the evolution of SQ?????
>
>
>I think Ant gave a perfect example (from Pirsig):
>"It does tend to reveal Dynamic Quality by blocking static intellectual
>patterns but you need those patterns to keep from harm. People on peyote go
>walking in front of oncoming cars and get killed because they think they are
>one with God and no harm can come to them. The static patterns that were
>blocked would have prevented that. In the American Indian ritual a guard
>who does not take peyote is posted outside the teepee to prevent anyone from
>wandering off by himself. They know what can happen."
>
>If you don't have the static patterns, you have degeneration and death. So
>you need SQ for the DQ, just as you need DQ for the SQ to evolve.
>
>So far as I understand it, 'conservatism' is pointing out the value of the SQ.
>
>Sam
>
>
>
>MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
>Mail Archives:
>Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
>Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
>MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
>To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
>http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 19 2005 - 12:17:05 BST