Re: MD Pirsig the postmodernist?

From: Elizaphanian (elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Sat Mar 01 2003 - 18:19:59 GMT

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Making sense of it (levels)"

    David - it is a good thought, worth exploring anyway (which I might do
    tomorrow if I get a moment). There's definitely something in it.

    Sam

    "Bush's speechwriters may be able to help him talk the talk, but does he
    kneel the kneel?" (Alex Pennell)

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Buchanan" <DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 4:28 PM
    Subject: RE: MD Pirsig the postmodernist?

    > DMB said:
    > > That's it. I just wanted to put this anti-metaphysical stance into some
    > kind
    > > of a context. I hope to address some of the issues raised in this thread
    > > later, but wanted to get that on the table. Another thing I learned from
    > my
    > > little enclopedia, was that Wittgenstein wrote his first major work
    while
    > on
    > > active duty and as a prisoner of war. Do you suppose this had anything
    to
    > do
    > > with the rise of analytic philosophy? I mean, it seems just as
    anti-German
    > > as it does anti-metaphysical? One wonders if the split between the
    > > continental philosophers and the anglo-american philosophers was really
    > > motivated by nationalism or patriotism. Just a thought.
    >
    > Sam said:
    > Except that Wittgenstein fought for the German side, not the
    anglo-american.
    > (Specifically, the Austrians. Because he was, of course, an
    Austrian......)
    >
    > DMB says:
    > Good point. I stand corrected. Since Wittgenstein was born in Viennna, but
    > studied with Russell at Cambridge, inspired the Vienna circle but also
    read
    > poetry to them, maybe he's not the best example. But what about the idea
    > that the continental/anglo-american split was motivated by nationalism and
    > patriotism? I mean, today the harshest critics of Marx, for example, do so
    > for political reasons, not philosophical reasons. Or when was the last
    time
    > you heard of a conservative post-structuralist? There but be a few
    examples
    > of such a strange creature, but if the critics are right the various
    > post-modern schools are filled with left-wingers. I should probably change
    > the thread name is this question prompts further posts. I guess it should
    be
    > a thread called "the politics of philosophy" or something. But it was just
    a
    > thought...
    >
    > Thanks.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 18:19:35 GMT