RE: MD Essentialist and anti-essentialist

From: Paul Turner (paul@turnerbc.co.uk)
Date: Tue Sep 06 2005 - 11:27:50 BST

  • Next message: Case: "Re: MD Katrina - Thousands Dead ?"

    Scott,

    >Paul said:
    >Well, I don't think you've 'proved' that values are necessarily
    >concepts just yet.
    >
    >Scott:
    >Well, strictly speaking I am saying that concepts are necessary to value,
    >and therefore real at all levels. But of course, this is not 'proven', but
    >then the MOQ isn't 'proven' either.

    Paul: Of course, that's why I wrote 'proved' and not proved.

    >What I am trying to point out is that language depends on essences, that
    >is,
    >universals, the meanings of words. The universalist/nominalist debates of
    >the Middle Ages were about whether essences were real beyond their usage in
    >human language. So what I am first saying is the obvious point that value
    >(meaning) in human language clearly depends on essences, though in this
    >context, essences are usually called concepts. In this context, the value
    >of
    >a word depends on its manifesting a concept, and the value of a concept
    >depends on its being manifested by a word. Thus the existent (a particular
    >speech act) depends on the essent (more accurately, a network of essences),
    >and the value of the essent requires the existent. As I say, within human
    >language, this is obvious.

    Paul: Firstly, I don't see how an essent that necessarily depends on
    something else can be meaningfully called an essent. I thought the whole
    point of an essent was that it was non-relational.

    Secondly, in Derridean terms you seem to be saying there is a signified
    (concept) waiting for a signifier (word) for its expression. However, if
    you want to be a thoroughgoing 'differentialist' i.e. one who completely
    rejects the principle of self-identity, then signifier and signified cannot
    form the unity you seem to refer to. Instead there is an ongoing process of
    signification - differance. This seems to contradict your position as
    stated above, yet you claim consistency with the differential mysticism of
    Magliola.

    However, I can hear the sound of Nishida approaching.... :-)

    Regards,

    Paul

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 06 2005 - 14:51:22 BST