Re: MD MoQ and MC Escher

From: -Peter (pcorteen@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 09 2005 - 22:12:02 BST

  • Next message: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD A Christian interpretation of the MOQ"

    Hi C.L.,

    Having looked around for definitions of what 'art' and use of the word 'art'
    means I'm satisfied that a deliberate 'arrangment' of some kind is always
    involved. Of course that doesn't begin to answer questions about what is
    'good' art; one measure of how good is a work of art might be for how long
    the arrangement is preserved.

    C.L., like you I can't keep up with all the posts on this discussion group;
    I'm new to it and a lot of threads go over my head because I don't have a
    specialist's understanding of words used in a particular context. So my
    approach now is to stay on just a few threads. Also like you, I haven't
    always replied to mailings to me but that was because I didn't find
    something worthwhile to say.

    -Peter

    On 9/9/05, C.L. Everett <seaelle@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > Interesting, Peter. The word "art" is like the word "love". It has
    > almost no meaning out of context. Perhaps no word does. They only
    > "seem" to when the user is engulfed by or swallowed up by the context.
    >
    > The experience of viewing art as an object is primarily a subjective
    > experience until the "personal" experience meets up with or is
    > "influenced by" culture or society (when it mixes with "taste" and
    > "education") and then the artwork itself becomes political and/or
    > "celebrity".
    >
    > I agree that drawing is drawing, a technical skill but I think Escher
    > qualifies in the artist camp because of his ideas. Recursively.
    > Transformation. Absence of inside/outside. But then I think
    > conceptual artists are artists. It's not about the "pretty" or the
    > aesthetic" for me--it's the idea.
    >
    > I haven't looked at Sickert, but I will.
    >
    > An aside about this list and posting. I'm having horrible trouble
    > keeping track of postings. There seems to be a giant time lag between
    > the time I post and the time my post makes it to the list. In the
    > meantime, what feels like hundreds of responses descend upon my
    > mailbox and as a consequence, I get seriously lost. So, I'm sure I'm
    > missing responses to posts I've made and I feel bad. I'm not
    > intentionally ignoring anyone. Anybody have a technique for tracking
    > posts? Or some methodology that works for you? Or is this just one
    > heck of chaotic place to hang? That's ok--I just don't want to insult
    > anyone I don't mean to.
    >
    > --
    > C.L. Everett
    >
    >
    > On 9/6/05, -Peter <pcorteen@gmail.com> wrote:
    > > M.C.Escher; a great draftsman and craftsman, producer of many
    > fascinating
    > > images, but I find myself a little hesitant about using the word
    > 'artist'.
    > > 'Art' is one of those words we use freely without having a clear idea of
    > > just what it is.
    > >
    > > With Sickert, on the other hand, you can wonder at the apparent
    > controlled
    > > folly of his brushwork and imagine the feelings he may have had when he
    > > painted - an expert transformer of DQ.
    > >
    > >
    > > On 9/5/05, Case <Case@ispots.com> wrote:
    > > > [Arlo]
    > > > I had mentioned Magritte's "The False Mirror" as a Good representation
    > of
    > > > paradox being at the core of our representational system.
    > > >
    > > > [Case replies]
    > > > I just visited an exhibit of M.C. Escher's work and was struck by how
    > he
    > > was
    > > > consciously involved in producing art that showed the tension between
    > the
    > > > static and dynamic qualities of light and darkness, form and chaos,
    > good
    > > and
    > > > evil, the organic and the inorganic. I bought a t-shirt and hung it on
    > my
    > > > back.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > MOQ.ORG <http://MOQ.ORG> - http://www.moq.org
    > > > Mail Archives:
    > > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 -
    > > http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > > >
    > > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > --
    > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > > Peter Corteen
    > > Home: +44 (0)208-882-7898
    > > Mobile: +44 (0)776-667-1194
    > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG <http://MOQ.ORG> - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    -- 
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Peter Corteen
    Home: +44 (0)208-882-7898
    Mobile: +44 (0)776-667-1194
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward  - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 09 2005 - 22:34:07 BST