Re: MD Cybernetics and sq evolution - good

From: Case (Case@iSpots.com)
Date: Mon Oct 03 2005 - 15:25:06 BST

  • Next message: Michael Hamilton: "Re: MD The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)"
  • Next message: platootje@netscape.net: "Re: MD Consciousness/MOQ, definition of"

    Marsha,
    Pirsig goes to a lot of trouble if not to justify what he is doing, at least
    to explain that trying to put a box around Quality is, from the mystic's
    point of view, a fool's errand. Any description of Quality is flawed. That
    is why they say: If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him! All we can
    say about Quality, or anything else for that matter, is that it is kinda
    like: (fill in the blank).
    Case

    > Mark and Case,
    >
    > Further, if good is a noun, doesn't that make it an object, or at least
    > static quality. Wouldn't that also indicate that it is illusion?
    >
    > Marsha

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 03 2005 - 15:55:18 BST