Re: MD The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)

From: mark maxwell (laughingpines@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Sat Oct 08 2005 - 06:36:28 BST

  • Next message: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)"
  • Next message: mark maxwell: "Re: MD Cybernetics and sq evolution - Secondary ontology as harmony."

    Bodvar Skutvik:
    That is my "credo". Everything regarding intellect as
    described in LILA points to what is described as SOM
    in ZMM. Can that be a coincidence? How can this escape
    everybody's attention?

    Mark:
    What a pile a tosh man. You're not a child.
    I should imagine after 8, long, arduous years of
    flogging this about the place, with zero recognition,
    you should be beginning to entertain the notion that
    you're talking crap Skutvik.
    And what utter crap it is.

    SOM is a pattern of Human intellect, pure and simple.
    Intellect first, SOM second, to be childish about it.
    Childish, because that is a level you may better
    relate to.

    Intellect is required to assert analogy; a house has
    foundations, therefore, everything has similar
    stabilising foundations.

    The mistake highlighted in ZMM is to displace quality
    with hypothetical foundations invented by Human
    intellect. That is the mistake you make.

            
            
                    
    ___________________________________________________________
    Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Oct 08 2005 - 07:00:32 BST