Re: MD Re: The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)

From: ian glendinning (psybertron@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 12 2005 - 08:52:55 BST

Next message: David Harding: "Re: MD The 4th level renamed?"

Previous message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD Looking for the Primary Difference"
Next in thread: skutvik@online.no: "Re: MD Re: The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)"
Maybe reply: skutvik@online.no: "Re: MD Re: The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ant, Bo, Scott,
I'm a one point at a time person ... so without wishing to dilute thisthread - can I just say ..
When Ant says to BoI do agree that some theories don't have references to themselves buta metaphysics – by definition being a map of all reality - must have aplace for itself within reality. Otherwise it isn't a metaphysics!
I say Hallelujah.As I said several times and Scott agreed,the recursion is not a problem,it's the solution, a virtue (quality probably).
You with us so far Bo ?Ian(PS For a bonus point - I think I must believe in metaphysics after all.)

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: David Harding: "Re: MD The 4th level renamed?"
Previous message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD Looking for the Primary Difference"
Next in thread: skutvik@online.no: "Re: MD Re: The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)"
Maybe reply: skutvik@online.no: "Re: MD Re: The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 12 2005 - 09:03:42 BST