Re: MD Cybernetics and sq evolution - Secondary ontology as harmony.

From: ian glendinning (psybertron@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Oct 21 2005 - 00:43:12 BST

  • Next message: mark maxwell: "Re: MD Cybernetics and sq evolution - Secondary ontology as harmony."

    Mark you said
    I undeserstand biologists have a tight definition of what passes for
    life, but this is going to have to change. It's got to go. That which
    will replace the biologists definition of life will be a definition
    based upon cybernetics i feel ...

    I do keep saying "life" not "biology" for that reason - biology just
    happened to be the most obvious form of life anyone had experienced
    (so far) - I also said the chemical / biological debates about
    replicating "genetic" materials rage on anyway. Carbon biology has no
    monopoly on life. (Life is more fundamental than any particular form
    of life.)

    You also said
    As an MOQer, i see an opportunity to provide a metaphysical basis for
    cybernetic self organising systems.

    Me too, methinks
    I don't know whether you've ever noticed, but it was cybernetics that
    took me into the surpising turn into the fundamentals of "quantum
    information" - from which I've not yet emerged. (See my blogs about
    BCS Cybernetics group, etc - several recently)

    Exciting times
    Ian

    On 10/20/05, mark maxwell <laughingpines@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    > Hello Ian,
    > nothing specific here, just wanted to thank you for
    > clarification.
    >
    > I shall add though, that Plotinus regarded rocks to be
    > as 'in a deep sleep'. I think he regarded living
    > entities to lie on a continuum between matter and
    > Intellect - matter is as asleep and intellect is wide
    > awake.
    >
    > Pirsig has stated that plotinus is close to his own
    > view, so i think this may be significant:
    > All levels are alive in that they express value
    > patterns.
    > I undeserstand biologists have a tight definition of
    > what passes for life, but this is going to have to
    > change. It's got to go.
    > That which will replace the biologists definition of
    > life will be a definition based upon cybernetics i
    > feel, and particularly with reference to any self
    > organising system - material, biological, social and
    > Intellectual, AI and all sorts of stuff.
    >
    > Now, as an MOQer, i see an opportunity to provide a
    > metaphysical basis for cybernetic self organising
    > systems, and that is a direction i think will bare
    > fruit.
    >
    > All the best,
    > Mark
    >
    >
    >
    > ___________________________________________________________
    > How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
    > snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 21 2005 - 00:50:48 BST