Re: MD Cybernetics and sq evolution - Secondary ontology as harmony.

From: mark maxwell (laughingpines@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Thu Oct 20 2005 - 20:32:07 BST

  • Next message: mark maxwell: "Re: MD Cybernetics and sq evolution - Secondary ontology as harmony."

    Hello Ian,
    nothing specific here, just wanted to thank you for
    clarification.

    I shall add though, that Plotinus regarded rocks to be
    as 'in a deep sleep'. I think he regarded living
    entities to lie on a continuum between matter and
    Intellect - matter is as asleep and intellect is wide
    awake.

    Pirsig has stated that plotinus is close to his own
    view, so i think this may be significant:
    All levels are alive in that they express value
    patterns.
    I undeserstand biologists have a tight definition of
    what passes for life, but this is going to have to
    change. It's got to go.
    That which will replace the biologists definition of
    life will be a definition based upon cybernetics i
    feel, and particularly with reference to any self
    organising system - material, biological, social and
    Intellectual, AI and all sorts of stuff.

    Now, as an MOQer, i see an opportunity to provide a
    metaphysical basis for cybernetic self organising
    systems, and that is a direction i think will bare
    fruit.

    All the best,
    Mark

                    
    ___________________________________________________________
    How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
    snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 20 2005 - 20:37:06 BST