From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 03:29:28 GMT
This didn't show up so I am going to rewrite it..sorry
if it comes up twice.
DM said: If your products and services have enough
quality you don't need to advertise. I would rather
see art on the walls than adverts, how is that for
quality?
This reminds me of the conversation about quality not
being in the painting or the observer.....
So what if a Campbell soup ad was replaced with
Warhol's Campbell soup painting? Is that not "really"
art but advertising in disguise? Did it suddenly
become quality because an "artist" created it and not
an "advertiser".
Is a desire to eliminate advertising because it
manipulates values like a desire to eliminate art you
don't like because it manipulates what you think as
being beautiful?
"He treats objects like women" the Dude
Erin
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 02 2005 - 04:28:46 GMT