RE: Fw: MD Rhetoric

From: Case (Case@iSpots.com)
Date: Fri Nov 04 2005 - 22:55:57 GMT

Next message: david buchanan: "RE: MD Re: Quality, subjectivity and the 4th level"

Previous message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD Looking for the primary difference"
In reply to: Matt Kundert: "RE: Fw: MD Rhetoric"
Next in thread: Matt Kundert: "Re: MD Rhetoric"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

David said:
>>How has philosphy turned into science? Why the special status for one
>>particular description among many?

[Case]
People no longer ask why is there air? They ask what is air? What are its
properties? In short what questions can we ask at have verifiable answers.
Special status is derived from the satisfaction this produces.

Matt:
No, you've misunderstood. I was referring to the respective ways we view
SOM, the entrenched enemy. As far as I can tell, DMB doesn't like
reductionist scientific materialism and I don't like reductionism.

[Case]
What's not to like?

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: david buchanan: "RE: MD Re: Quality, subjectivity and the 4th level"
Previous message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD Looking for the primary difference"
In reply to: Matt Kundert: "RE: Fw: MD Rhetoric"
Next in thread: Matt Kundert: "Re: MD Rhetoric"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 05 2005 - 01:17:15 GMT