RE: MD A Question of Balance / Rules of the Game

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sun Nov 06 2005 - 00:23:33 GMT

  • Next message: david buchanan: "RE: MD Holy Holy Holy Trinity"

    Case berates David:

    > [David]
    > I disagree,
    >
    > What with the popular, of cultural relativism I actually think this is a
    > dangerous standpoint to take. People are poor, people are rich, it's all
    > relative; people live, people are killed, it's all relative; people lie,
    > people are honest, it's all relative.
    >
    > It's not. What happens in one culture is not completely disrelated to
    > another. Just because hedonism is bad in one culture and O.K. in another
    > doesn't suddenly make hedonism 'relative'. Hedonism, i.e intellectual
    > advocacy of biological quality, threatens social value and so it is bad not
    > just for one particular person in one particular culture at a certain time,
    > but for all people, everywhere.
    >
    > [Case]
    > If this were just nonsense I could have let it slide, as I have no desire
    > to get into this debate but this not just nonsense it is pernicious
    > nonsense. Letting it alone is like leaving a loaded gun on a preschool
    > playground. The idea that there are Moral Absolutes and that one culture is
    > "right" and another is "wrong" is exactly the case the Muslim extremists
    > make make and use to justify their guerilla wars against the Great Satan.
    > It is a very bad idea to judge one culture from the perspective of another.
    > This practice has been soundly condemned within the social sciences and
    > rightly so.

    Platt points out to Case a passage from Lila:

    "A culture that supports the dominance of social values over biological
    values is an absolutely superior culture to one that does not, and a
    culture that supports the dominance of intellectual values over social
    values is absolutely superior to one that does not. It is immoral to speak
    against a people because of the color of their skin, or any other genetic
    characteristic because these are not changeable and don't matter anyway.
    But it is not immoral to speak against a person because of his cultural
    characteristics if those cultural characteristics are-immoral. These are
    changeable and they do matter." (Lila, 24)

    So much for social science and the notion that all cultures are moral
    equals. David got it right.

    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 01:40:31 GMT