Re: MD Quality, subjectivity and the 4th level

From: skutvik@online.no
Date: Sun Nov 13 2005 - 07:51:23 GMT

  • Next message: Case: "RE: MD Holy Holy Holy Trinity"

    Hi David M.

    11 Nov. you wrote:

    > Actually you can sense society take a look
    > at any great building, and for a bit of intellect
    > read a good book, this is the advantage you get
    > when you have 4 levels of SQ to work/play with.

    Right, your point underpins my assertion that the original way of
    tucking the SOM under the MOQ doesn't work, except in the
    "most platitudinous sense". I don't question the advantage of the
    4 levels, I find the MOQ superb, it's just that its full potential is
    squandered by this way of encasing the SOM.

    > Still can't see why everything on the 4th level
    > equals SOM unless you define intellect very narrowly.

    Yes, that's the very point, the intellectual level is static and
    infinitely more narrow than most people's notion of it ... a notion
    that isn't even in accordance with "Oxford's Advanced" that
    actually says that intellect is the S/O, but this I have repeated for
    ages without making the slightest dent in people's pre-
    conceptions.

    > Lets say intellect is about using concepts.

    Intellect is "out of" society and employs the foremost social
    pattern language to promote its own value, there is nothing
    controversial here.

    > You can
    > split these into those by intuition and those by postulation
    > as per Anthony's thesis.

    Everybody wants the intellectual level to be some mental ability,
    Pirsig that of manipulating symbols, you that of using concepts
    (the same thing BTW) but intellectual VALUE is that of seeing the
    symbols what is symbolized, concepts what is conceptualized
    distinction. An unknown reality for the "social" world.
       
    > The latter have been dominated
    > by an SO metaphysics, but as the MOQ and other examples
    > show this is not a necessity. Also see my other post today
    > in a new thread.

    The point about "intuition/postulation" is so special that I must
    dwell on it. You see "intuition" is one of the concepts I call "grand"
    (related to Quality in a way that could have made them the
    ground for some Q-like metaphysics) ) so this pair can be
    compared to Quality while SOM ruled. Thus it is not all correct to
    say that postulation is "dominated by SOM" it's rather that
    postulation IS SOM.

    If that is what you mean, disregard my spoon-feeding. ;-). Haven't
    yet studied your other post. Will do.

    Bo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 13 2005 - 08:01:01 GMT