From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Nov 17 2005 - 13:35:19 GMT
Scott,
I don't understand the tetrathingy clearly but
something you said really resonated:
The key is the fourth point. The LCI is, by and
> large what one CAN say, or
> at least, try to say. For instance, that the more
> one puts X under the
> microscope, the more it starts looking like Y, and
> vice versa, and that X
> and Y create each other in mutual opposition
This reminds me about the discussion of
intellect...... I feel the moq treats value as
"desire" for the first three levels and then "value"
at the fourth level becomes "belief".
To me this is creating a belief/desire division. But
as the above says the more you put belief under the
microscope the more it resembles desire and vice
versa. So to me if it is "value" at one level and
"value" at another level then it is the same.
I was just wondering if you thought belief and desire
could be seen as contradictory or not..that is I see
values as 'desire/belief'
I think this helps me with all the pre-intellectual
stuff too.... I feel people act that their desires are
being filtered through beliefs and so are not living
as passionately as they would "pre-intellect/beliefs".
If you recognize "values" on all the levels the
division of desires/beliefs becomes just a matter of
degree....whereas we use desire for lower level of
values and beliefs for higher level of values.
Erin
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 17 2005 - 13:43:25 GMT