Re: MD Emotions and subjectivity

• Previous message: ian glendinning: "Re: FW: RE: MD Calling all atheists"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Hamilton: "MD Emotions and subjectivity"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Platt

On 2 Dec. you ended your post thus:

 
> A very fine thought indeed. Your term "dynamic component" leads to
> just this sort of "pushing the envelope" thinking, the kind of
> thinking Pirsig encouraged us to engage in. You're on to something
> here, Bo. Way to go!

It's encouraging that there are a few of us who understand the
very idea of the dynamic/static duality - even at the top level. I
have followed your various clashes with the "intellectualists" in
the political field and found your defence of (our) static
intellectual values BALANCED WITH THE QUALITY
OVERVIEW so good that it gave me gooseflesh. My own
"campaign" with intellectualism in the philosophical field has not
been so successful, but the nature of the battle is the very same.
Let goodness win!

Bo

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

• Next message: Magnus Berg: "Re: MD Longer transcript of ZMM?"
• Previous message: ian glendinning: "Re: FW: RE: MD Calling all atheists"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Hamilton: "MD Emotions and subjectivity"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 04 2005 - 08:59:14 GMT