From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Dec 06 2005 - 12:12:11 GMT
> [Platt]
> "And beyond that is an even more compelling reason; societies and thoughts
> and principles themselves are no more than sets of static patterns.These
> patterns can't by themselves perceive or adjust to Dynamic Quality. Only a
> living being can do that." (Lila, 13)
>
> [Arlo]
> You say this, again, as if my stance denies it. I don't. What you continue
> to do is misequate "collective consciousness" with "societies".
OK, I'll take you at your word. "Collective consciousness" isn't the same
as society. But immediately you begin to say something else:
> He also says that mental patterns are derived from social mediation.
You bring in society as the foundation of thought, and then repeat the
idea:
> That
> is, the "individual's" thoughts emerge through social mediation, not
> independent from it.
Then comes the big switch where society is suddenly replaced by
"collective consciousness:"
> So that "individual" who can respond to DQ, does so BY
> VIRTUE of the collective consciousness.
Perhaps before going any further you could clear up the difference between
"society" and "collective." I don't see how why a "collective" of
individuals doesn't equate to a "society" of individuals. In other words,
what's the difference between "collective consciousness" and "social
consciousness?"
Thanks,
Platt
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 06 2005 - 13:38:40 GMT