Re: MD Systematic about the Sophists (Kingsley)

From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:41:01 GMT

  • Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD Changes"

    Dear Sam,

    You wrote 11 Mar 2003 19:29:12 -0000 that Kingsley's 'book is a project
    aimed at showing the profound continuities between Pythagorean (Orphic)
    magic, myths and ritual, as best represented in the figure of the
    pre-Socratic philosopher Empedocles, and Plato's perspective, especially as
    set out in the Phaedo.'

    That supports my idea that the birth of the intellectual level should not be
    situated there and then. The gradual development from logos out of mythos is
    simply a development within the intellectual level. The mythos should not be
    identified with social patterns of values (even if Pirsig seems to do so)
    and the logos not with (all) intellectual patterns of values. They are just
    lower quality respectively higher quality intellectual patterns of value.

    There is another reason why the development of logos out of mythos should
    not be equated with a development of the intellectual level out of the
    social level:
    In the MoQ intellectual patterns of value cannot 'grow on top of' biological
    patterns of value. Without social patterns of value in between, mind cannot
    grow from (even animate) matter. Although historically logos was derived
    from mythos, we can now educate our children to think logically without
    having to teach them to think mythically. So myths etc. (or mythical
    thinking) cannot be the social level which the MoQ needs.

    We can only teach our children to think in the way our society needs after
    first making them behave however. Until they reach a certain age (around 7
    years old?) it is no use telling children to do something because of this or
    that reason. They will do what you tell them if you tell them emphatically
    enough, whatever the reasons you give, and if you behave according to what
    you say. Properly motivating what they do is something they only learn
    gradually in the course of say another 7 years. Only then they can be said
    to really participate in intellectual patterns of value, by consciously
    acting according to ideas and being susceptible to persuasion (instead of
    the 'blackmailing' or at least bargaining which you need at an earlier age
    to make them do something which they really don't want). This
    behaving-ourselves-because-of-social-pressures (as distinguished from
    acting-for-conscious-reasons) is the social level the MoQ needs.

    With friendly greetings,

    Wim

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:40:15 GMT