Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review

From: Matt the Enraged Endorphin (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 01:49:22 GMT

  • Next message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review"

    Joe,

    I am very, very unclear on what you are saying. You say I've constructed a
    strawman, but I'm not at all sure what the strawman is. You say I'm caught
    in SOM, but I have no idea what that means for you. For instance, when you
    and Wim talk about "SOM Quality" and "MoQ Quality" you lose me because I
    have a bit different understanding of what SOM and the MoQ are. The
    criticism you seem to be making of me, I would say, is suffering from
    definitional sleight-of-hand, the kind I referred to when talking to
    Squonk. ("Squonk wrote a Review," 3/11) You say I prefer SOM, and then
    assume that I am talking from an "SOM perspective" (whatever that may be),
    and then criticize me for getting both perspectives wrong: "I do not see
    how in SOM Quality can be anti-essence since it depends on essence for its
    existence. If you are referring to MoQ Quality you do not accept
    intuition." I don't get it. Is that a critique?

    The problem is we share too few premises (like "MoQ," "SOM," "metaphor,"
    "MoQ perspective," "SOM perspective," etc.) to engage at this point. You
    just go on assuming we do share enough premises to engage in the way you've
    set out, which apparently makes it look like I've constructed a
    strawman. You say mine isn't a "quality exposition," but I can't really
    say that yours is either. You seem to be using the terms in a contestable
    way (much as I am), but I don't know what that way is. DMB would surely
    accuse me of never explaining my terms, but at least in the post in
    question, I told the reader what Quality was ("the ultimate metaphor") and
    what a metaphor was ("an indecipherable sound or scratch") which seemed
    like the most important terms that I was using in controversial ways.

    Matt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 14 2003 - 01:51:00 GMT