Re: MD Pirsig's conception of ritual

From: Elizaphanian (elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 16:40:40 GMT

  • Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD mental and neural states"

    Hi David,

    Sam quoted Wittgenstein (from his 'Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough')
    > "The same savage, who stabs the picture of his enemy apparently in order
    to
    > kill him, really builds his hut out of wood and carves his arrow skilfully
    > and not in effigy."
    >
    > DMB says:
    > Not in effigy. Right on. I think this is consistent with Pirsig's
    > distinction between ACTUALLY and SYMBOLICALLY. To the savage, who wasn't
    > really all that savage, stabbing a picture ACTUALLY killed his enemy or
    > prey.

    That is precisely the interpretation that Wittgenstein wished to demonstrate
    as misguided.

    > "I believe that the characteristic feature of primitive man is that he
    does
    > not act from opinions (contrary to Frazer)."
    >
    > DMB says:
    > Neither true nor false, not a view or opinion at all. Isn't that what I've
    > been saying? Rituals and myths are valid only as rituals and myths. As
    > facts, they are impossible non-sense. They are NOT intellectual and they
    > aren't supposed to be. Expecting them to and wanting them to make
    > intellectual sense IS the death of God.

    You're being monolithic again. W's remark was specifically about 'primitive'
    approaches. That doesn't mean that ALL ritual is primitive.

    > "I should like to say: nothing shows our kinship to those savages better
    > than the fact that Frazer has on hand a word as familiar to himself and to
    > us as 'ghost' or 'shade' in order to describe the views of these people...
    > An entire mythology is stored within our language."
    >
    > DMB says:
    > An entire mythology is stored in the language. Yes, not only does this
    > support the idea that common sense language represents our most
    fundamental
    > tradition and is therefore a social level thing, but also helps to explain
    > what Pirsig means when he says all intellect is derived from that level.
    In
    > fact, as Pirsig paints it, we are far more than just the kin to these
    > myth-minded savages. We ARE them. We can't escape this dimension or level
    of
    > our beings anymore than we can escape our bodies.

    Precisely. So why draw a hard and fast distinction between mythology and
    intellect?

    Sam

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 26 2003 - 17:57:43 GMT