From: Valence (valence10@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 23:18:59 GMT
Hey Platt,
PLATT (to Johnny)
> No, innovation doesn't determine high quality art. The criteria for
artistic
> quality are the degree that the artwork in question reveals truths about
> life and excites "apprehensions of things to obscure for existing
> language."
RICK
Your 'criteria for artistic quality' sounds, in many respects, reminiscient
of Pirsig's defintion of the intellectual level...
PIRSIG:
"For purposes of MOQ precision, let's say the intellectual level is the
same as mind. It is the collection and manipulation of symbols, created
in the brain, that stand for patterns of experience."
RICK
Given this definition and your feelings about Quality in art.... Do you
think that works of art which reveal truths about life are kinds of
intellectual patterns that stand for patterns of experience?
thanks
rick
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 26 2003 - 23:19:17 GMT