From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Mar 27 2003 - 01:44:15 GMT
Hi Platt, rick, all,
As a definition of "intellectual art," we might consider Ayn Rand's views on
art. She thought art should depict what could be and what should be. She
said that this was Aristotle's view as well. However, with her Objectivism
she parts company with Pirsig (and probably Platt?) as she rejects the
notion of the artist as a sort of mystic, channeling some other
non-objective reality. In MOQ terms, she rejects art as a response to DQ
within a framework of existing static patterns and that someone can have a
DQ experience of art as Pirsig described in the "hearing a new song and
buying the record" part of Lila which he used to distinguish static and
dynamic quality.
Though art could reveal an intellectual truth, I see an aspect of great art
as being a mediator of DQ experience for many people over many years. (Some
may object that DQ is unmediated?) Though as static patterns change, the
greatness is more of a static pattern of being an influence on other art.
Thanks,
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 27 2003 - 01:43:41 GMT