Re: MD A conflict of values

From: Elizaphanian (elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2003 - 17:35:00 BST

  • Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD Philosophy and Theology"

    Hi Steve,

    > I guess I should have said that Fundamentalism is anti-intellectual
    instead
    > of un-intellectual. The rejecting of intellect is done on the
    intellectual
    > level since they have a reason for rejecting it. It's just that as you
    say
    > it is a very low quality reason.
    >
    > Intellectual values for Islamic militants include blind submission and
    > sacrifice to society (confused with God) and hatred of America as a
    > religious duty. These are intellectual rather than social for them
    because
    > they are not only copied but explicitly taught.

    Agreed.

    > It does say something. It says that societies that foster intellectual
    > freedom are better than ones that don't.

    I think this is a situation where we need to be more fine-grained than that.
    We agree that the fundamentalism is an intellectual pattern, it's just of
    pathologically low quality. I think the West needs an analysis of
    fundamentalism that does more than say that it is evil (true though that
    is). To my way of thinking, it requires a greater degree of self-awareness
    about religion in the West. Something I'm trying to do my little bit about.

    > Again, I was too loose with language. "liberty, democracy and equality"
    are
    > intellectual values that are demanded by reason (as always, based on some
    > set of metaphysical assumptions (which you may call some mythology? I
    think
    > that if you do, you are using the word in an unusual way.)) These
    "wonderful
    > things" are required for the intellectual level to flourish.

    It is not clear to me how these things are demanded by reason. I think they
    are perceptions of value, ie of high quality. I see reason as neutral
    between, eg, democracy and tyranny.

    As for my use of 'mythology', I'd recommend a book by Mary Midgley called
    "Science as Salvation: A Modern Myth and its Meaning". That's the source for
    my point about the mythology established by Bacon.

    > I think you are right. Democracy does not need to be imposed, just
    allowed
    > to happen.

    Agreed.

    > Look to what the Taliban did when they came to power in Afghanistan for
    > examples of the sort of social control over intellect that Bib Laden and
    his
    > likes would like.

    OK.

    Cheers
    Sam

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 30 2003 - 21:08:43 BST