From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2003 - 23:35:16 BST
Platt, Sam and all,
Sam asked:
Do you think there is a difference between how a fact is characterised in
SOM thinking, and how it is characterised in the MoQ? If so, how would you
describe that difference?
DMB says:
Since you've started a new thread, maybe you're raising a new issue. But
just to be clear, the distinction between myth and fact is hardly related to
truth claims. Facts, in this sense, are not even necessarily true. A fact is
a statement that can be demonstrated to be true OR false, while a myth is
NEITHER true NOR false. If I say, "My friend Sam is a rock", that is a
metaphor - just as a myth is a metaphor. To read such a statement as a fact
renders it absurd and impossible. It would mean that you are a dislodged
chuck of hardened sediment or crytalized minerals. The distinction between
myth and fact is not about what's true and what's not, its just about two
different forms of expression. To make this distinction is only to make the
simple assertion that for some things have to be read symbolically, and not
literally, in order to make intellectual sense. Facts are intended to be
taken literally, while myths are not.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 30 2003 - 23:36:57 BST