Re: MD mental and neural states

From: Elizaphanian (elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 10:42:17 BST

  • Next message: Elizaphanian: "MD Re: Pirsig the postmodernist?"

    Hi Scott,

    I asked:
    > > Why can't all matter be incipiently conscious, which is only manifested
    > when
    > > it attains a certain order of complexity? I still don't understand why
    you
    > > reject that. (I'm probably being particularly dense at the moment)

    Scott said:
    > It could be, but I see assuming that as a weak response to the argument.
    It
    > would still be necessary that space and time be transcended for the
    > incipient consciousness of elementary particles to merge into our
    perception
    > of big and complex things, so I see assuming that electrons or whatever
    have
    > some sort of ur-conscioousness as not getting us very far.

    The angle that I am coming at this from is a denial of 'materialism' (or SOM
    even), by which I mean the idea that matter and mind are radically different
    things. If you deny that fundamental axiom (which I think has to follow for
    a Christian, BTW, given the claim of Incarnation; it's also, of course,
    ruled out in the MoQ) then it's not an 'assumption' that electrons have
    ur-consciousness, it's a basic perspective. (Same thing, different
    interpretation). I just smell a very faint whiff of dualism in your
    argument, which I'm uncomfortable with.

    > My preferred response is to assume that matter, along with space and time,
    > is a manifestation of full-blown, not incipient, consciousness. To put it
    > another way, the universe of space, time, mass, and observers of same, is
    > one way that consciousness creates reality. It should be noted that this
    > does not make matter unreal. What is illusory is its unconscious
    appearance
    > to us stuck in our current stage of human evolution.

    I do have much sympathy with where you're going with this. I'm just
    quibbling with details.

    Sam

    "A good objection helps one forward, a shallow objection, even if it is
    valid, is wearisome." Wittgenstein

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 11:40:51 BST