From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 14:35:15 BST
Hi Steve, Rick:
> STEVE
> I see Dynamic morality as what the MOQ
> > offers us in place of the static absolute right and wrong that people
> > have unsuccessfully tried to uncover for so long. Since static patterns
> > change over time, there are no moral absolutes or fixed standards for
> > behavior that are universally best for all time. "Best" is a moving target
>> and so the morality that we must follow if we hope to achieve it is dynamic.
>
> RICK
> Agreed.
How do you guys explain the following?
PIRSIG
But what's not so obvious is that, given a value-centered Metaphysics of
Quality, it is absolutely, scientifically moral for a doctor to prefer the
patient. This is not just an arbitrary social convention that should apply
to some doctors but not to all doctors, or to some cultures but not all
cultures. It's true for all people at all times, now and forever, a moral
pattern of reality as real as H20. We're at last dealing with morals on
the basis of reason. (13)
Looks like a moral absolute to me. :-)
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 14:36:18 BST