From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 21:38:02 BST
Dear Platt and Jonathan,
Platt wrote 21 Apr 2003 10:28:55 -0400:
'Perhaps we can agree that Pirsig presents an absolute metaphysics wherein
relativity is allowed free reign.'
I think a case can also be made that Pirsig presents a relative metaphysics
(because it recognizes the possibility and truth of alternative
methaphycics, of 'alternative paintings in the art gallery of the
intellectual level') wherein absolute statements (like Subject-Object
Thinkings presupposition that there is a reality independent from our
experience) are considered to be high-quality ideas.
Maybe we can agree that the MoQ can paradoxically be understood as BOTH an
absolute metaphysics which values relativity AND a relative metaphysics
which values absolute statements?
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 21 2003 - 22:27:45 BST