From: Elizaphanian (elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Sun May 04 2003 - 13:38:59 BST
Hi Rick,
I'm gratified that you think the essay is worth a whole 'review' but I'd quibble a little with
something you said:
: RICK
: I think you're right. I don't think Pirsig's vision of the MoQ sees humans
: as the pinnacle of evolution (which is why he justifies human rights on the
: basis of the protection of more highly evolved 'ideas'.) To Pirsig, the
: human being is just another link the evolutionary chain. Sam's recent
: 'Eudiamonic MoQ' essay presents a conception of the MoQ which does make
: human individuals the crowning acheivement of evolution.
I think autonomous individuals do stand at the top of the evolutionary tree (in precisely the same
way that Pirsig thinks 'intellect' stands at the top) but I don't think that evolution has come to
an end, so 'crowning achievement' is misleading. Who knows what will come next?
Sam
"Even to have expressed a false thought boldly and clearly is already to have gained a great deal."
Wittgenstein, 1948
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun May 04 2003 - 13:41:15 BST