Re: MD Philosophy and Theology

From: phyllis bergiel (neilfl@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Mon May 05 2003 - 12:05:42 BST

  • Next message: phyllis bergiel: "Re: MD 'unmediated experience'"

    Sam:

    Consider it a cultural paranoia (on my part, if not on David's). For those
    of us who've been through or are in an American University there is are two
    things going on. One, the assumption that original, thought is no longer
    possible - papers are assigned that require a certain number of references,
    probably just so students read outside the assigned text, but the habit gets
    hardwired. And two, fear of future investigative wrath. Can you see the
    headlines of 2020? "Famous writer and university professor found to have
    stolen an idea. For proof, go to moq. archive.....
    Ah, for good old"unmediated (and unpreserved) conversation">
    > My point was precisely that Wilber wasn't saying anything that you hadn't
    already said, and that we
    > hadn't already debated. He was just an extra voice, one that you respect
    and that I don't. When you
    > make points I'll deal with them; I'll read the Wilber extracts you post
    (and I'll even go and have
    > another look at his website, maybe I'll even read something of his) but
    don't expect me to focus on
    > what he says rather than what you say. Life's too short.
    >
    > phyllis
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 05 2003 - 12:00:59 BST