From: Elizaphanian (elizaphanian@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 15:43:36 BST
Hi Platt,
: Connecting the other words isn't hard if you accept the MoQ
: presumptions:
:
: Quality=Reality (Existence)
: Quality=Experience (Now)
: Experience=Awareness=Apprehension=Consciousnes
: Consciousness="I" or Self ("It's Quality that has Lila." (11))
: Quality=the Tao (as you suggest)
:
: It is only when intellect does its divisive thing that we get these different
: words all pointing to the same phenomenon.
:
: Or so I'm beginning to conclude.
It was having the 'self' in there that made me want to question the identity of the various words. I
see the 'self' as a level 4 static pattern, not Quality as such, and many of the other words
(experience, consciousness etc) as the interplay between that static pattern and Quality/the Tao
itself. So although they are closely linked, I don't see them as equivalent. So from your original
list, I would make the following division:
Quality = Tao = "undifferentiated aesthetic continuum"
"I" or Self = level 4 static pattern
Reality, Now, Existence, Apprehension, Experience, Consciousness = interplay between the above.
So from the point of view of the level 4 pattern, the six latter synonyms can *appear* identical
with Quality and the Tao, but in fact they are distinct. I think they are relational terms.
(Consciousness could be a synonym for the static pattern)
Sam
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 06 2003 - 16:04:22 BST