From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Mon May 05 2003 - 15:14:28 BST
Hi Sam:
To my equating of:
Reality
Now
Existence
"I" or Self
Apprehension
Experience
Quality
Consciousness
The Tao
Sam replied:
> I think there are differences but it all depends on context. "In most cases
> (but not all) the meaning of a word depends upon its use in the language."
> (Wittgenstein - again!).
The "context" is the MoQ.
> I would not tend to equate 'The Tao' or 'Quality' (or possibly 'Reality')
> with the others. But that might just be due to my Western philosophical
> background.
The Tao and Quality do seem to be the same. There are number of
descriptions of the Tao, but probably the most often repeated one is,
"The Tao that can be described is not the Tao." Nevertheless, here's
one that sounds much like Quality:
Something mysteriously formed,
Born before heaven and earth.
In the silence and the void,
Standing alone and unchanging,
Ever present and in motion.
Perhaps it is the mother of ten thousand things.
I do not know its name.
Call it Tao.
Tao Te Ching
Connecting the other words isn't hard if you accept the MoQ
presumptions:
Quality=Reality (Existence)
Quality=Experience (Now)
Experience=Awareness=Apprehension=Consciousnes
Consciousness="I" or Self ("It's Quality that has Lila." (11))
Quality=the Tao (as you suggest)
It is only when intellect does its divisive thing that we get these different
words all pointing to the same phenomenon.
Or so I'm beginning to conclude.
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 05 2003 - 15:15:52 BST