Re: MD MOQ

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 12:59:08 BST

  • Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: MD Quality events and the levels"

    Paul and Squonk:
     
    Now there's an interesting example of quality to analyze, or should I say to
    apply the MoQ to.
     
    Though I've done the gearhead thing, cars, 4x4's and bikes, so I can
    appreciate a well-tuned engine, but, right now, living in rural utopia
    becoming mediocre suburbia, having the peace of a Sunday afternoon shattered
    by the blasting of some low self-esteem, conspicuously consuming weekend
    wannabe warrior/ yuppie the rest of the time, who thinks it his (and yes,
    it's 90% guys)right, I envision barbwire at guillotine height -

    squonk: Hello Phyllis, Sorry i called you Neil? Silly of me.
    The phrase, 'Quality event' was coined by Skutvik. This phrase is loaded with
    SoM shattering overtones, but the MoQ has moved on. In the MoQ, patterns
    harmonise in Dynamic/Static equilibrium. We may then wish to say that static
    patterns comprising a woman, and all other patterns, including those of a
    flower, harmonise in a moment of high value one morning. That is a beautiful
    thing and to disrupt harmony introduces low value.
    The engine and its mechanic may also harmonise. When they do, some, and
    perhaps very many of their patterns coalesce in an equilibrium between DQ and
    SQ.
    The engine straining over dunes or where ever is not an aesthetic
    appreciation of the engine, it is a dissolution of the engine which will then
    require re-tuning. If the rider was a master rider, the engine would require
    little tuning, be more pleasant on the ear, and last a long time. The social
    consequences would be more harmonious? Of course, the ill treatment of a
    cycle as a social status symbol in the manner you describe simply illustrates
    the dishonourable and low quality of the society which values such behaviour
    - a master rider would not abuse a cycle in such a frivolous and shameful
    manner.
    There is a story of the Emperor's butcher who never had to sharpen his knife?
    His skill with it was such that every cut was the easiest one available,
    presumably in a patterned relationship between butcher, flesh and knife.
     
    so, what is the quality event here? though I have a static pattern of
    appreciation for the sound, I also hate the damn noise to the point of taking
    pleasure in imagined pain and mayhem, (though, please realize, it is strictly
    imaginary!)

    This may relate more to the quality event thread and levels Paul was
    discussing, but I'd like to hear squonk's reply.
     
    Phyllis

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 14 2003 - 13:00:20 BST