Re: MD Quality events and the levels

From: Paul Turner (pauljturner@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Mon May 19 2003 - 11:36:52 BST

  • Next message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD Quality events and the levels"

    Hi Squonk

    > The Quality event is at once a coalescence and a
    > differentiation. If you pick one answer you lose the
    > insight of the other. Lila has Quality and Quality
    > has
    > Lila. As Mr Herrigel lamented: 'Is "It" spiritual
    > when
    > seen by the eyes of the body, and corporeal when
    > seen
    > by the eyes of the spirit-or both or neither?'
    >
    > Hello Paul,
    > I find this suggestion to be very exciting.
    > Thanks for your insight and support. It worries me
    > that i may be confusing
    > myself and others? But you see something in this
    > also?

    I do, and I find confusion sometimes signals the
    breaking down of rigidly held views prior to insight,
    of course it can also mean we're barking up the wrong
    Bodhi tree!
     
    > The complimentary view of coalescence, (or what ever
    > we may wish to call it,
    > and which may be a non-starter in any case), seems
    > to me to come right out of
    > the MoQ.

    I am finding the coalescence-differentiation
    complement really useful as I feel it describes the
    DQ-SQ relationship in terms of movement and lifts me
    out of thinking in terms of one 'thing' acting on
    another. You know what I mean?

    (There may be resonance's with Plotinus and
    > Spinoza? But i
    > discovered these later, and they are well
    > established western views.)

    I find resonances everywhere, too many, in a way! It
    can become a hobby of it's own, 'resonance spotting'
    :-)

    > I wish
    > to say that the anthropocentric view you explore is
    > exciting, and if i could
    > offer only a fraction of the support you have shown
    > me, i should be very
    > happy.

    Thanks, this thread has been really useful. The
    anthropocentric view is really just a fallout from
    trying to see how Pirsig's ideas matured. I am trying
    to see how he goes from his enthusiastic agreement
    with Protagoras - 'Man is the measure of all things'
    to an evolutionary hierarchy which predates man in
    terms of its scope. Maybe it was a bit of 'resonance
    spotting' on Pirsig's behalf!

    Another way to look at it is, is differentiation a
    'human' thing? Did it begin at the MoQ social level?
    Do you see what I'm getting at?

    cheers

    Paul

    __________________________________________________
    Yahoo! Plus
    For a better Internet experience
    http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 19 2003 - 11:42:27 BST