Re: RE: MD The mythology of science

From: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Sun May 25 2003 - 18:29:44 BST

  • Next message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD Structuralism in Pirsig"

    Sam said:
    That's why I've had a go at my own reformulation, around the idea of 'eudaimonia' as what best characterises level 4.

    DMB said:
    You're free to express your views or wrtie your own metaphysical system, but this is just too much. You're an intellectual hijacker. And you've taken narcissism to new heights in the attempt. Outrageous.

    Matt:
    Or, he's the next Plato, or Aristotle, or Aquinas, or Schopenhauer, or Hegel, or Marx. The list would go on and on. As you might guess, as a Rortyan and Bloomian, I say keep going Sam. I think you are doing wonderful things with the MoQ. Though I've given up metaphysics, your reformulation provides the type of creativity that I still find interesting and useful.

    Matt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun May 25 2003 - 18:31:26 BST