Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ

From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Mon May 26 2003 - 15:12:05 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"

    DMB,
     
    > Steve:
    > Also, though Wilber integrates such psychologists into his system which
    > seems to make it easy to then translate into Pirsig's, Wilber does not have
    > a social level. Because he looks at social and individual aspects of all
    > occasions, he doesn't seem to see a social level as a stage of human
    > development. His stages are most generally described as matter, body, mind,
    > soul, spirit. Like Pirsig's MOQ levels, I can understand these as levels of
    > awareness, but Wilber is missing a social step perhaps between body and
    > mind.
    >
    > dmb says:
    > No. I'm pretty sure you've made a mistake here. You're taking the "social"
    > in Pirsig's social level to mean collective.

    Steve says:
    What I was suggesting is that perhaps Wilber made this mistake.

    > Wilber certainly
    > includes stages in which myth and ritual are the guiding lights and
    > distinquishes those stages from the rational and scientific stages. I'm not
    > giving you much to chew on right now because I'm already late, but I could
    > make a clear case next week if you're interested.

    Steve:
    Looking forward to it.

    Thanks,
    Steve

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 26 2003 - 15:09:36 BST