Re: MD James's inversion

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Wed Jun 11 2003 - 17:30:05 BST

  • Next message: Trivik: "Re: MD James's inversion"

    But this dynamicism of intellectual level patterns seems to give less
    credibility to any particular idea - if in ten years it may not exist, why
    is it moral for a fleeting idea to kill off (or harm) society?

    Hi Johnny,
    Too much beer the night before huh? I know the feeling as a beer lover
    myslef. (But keep that strictly to yourself as i don't wish to gain the reputation
    of a lush? OK?)

    You raise a good point. But Social patterns are robust don't you feel? They
    are not that easily killed off. If it be the case that intellectual patterns
    begin to undermine social patterns so that society becomes pathological, then by
    definition that is a low Quality state for the happiness and well being of
    Human life. Having said that, intellectual patterns can and do raise Quality of
    life, as with the irradication of poverty, disease, and privilege of power. At
    least, that is a good harmonising state to be in when it is achieved?
    squonk

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 17:30:40 BST