From: Trivik (trivik@stwing.upenn.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 11 2003 - 17:31:48 BST
> But this dynamicism of intellectual level patterns seems to give less
> credibility to any particular idea - if in ten years it may not exist, why
> is it moral for a fleeting idea to kill off (or harm) society?
being static patterns which are forced to be updated so frequently
current ideas can claim to be the clearest mirroring of DQ.
a difference between ideas and art (which is one of the truer, not
clearer, mirrors of DQ) is that an idea (in general) points
to the same static pattern, while art (which may include some ideas) in
general may point to different static patterns at different times.
by clarity what is ment is that when comunicating (even with ones self)
one knows what it is that is being comunicated. so while actions commited
based on impusive reactions to say a piece of music are `better' one can
only `know' that it is better based on a retrospective reading of an
(posibly new) idea into the action.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 17:34:40 BST