RE: MD date of homo sapiens

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Jun 15 2003 - 19:20:10 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD The Transformation of Love"

    [Squank said:
     sq: More absolute garbage from the 'garbage supremo' Dave 'DuMB' Buchanan.
    Does anyone take this asshole seriously?
    Language, which is the manipulation of symbols, is more than 3,000 years
    old. Therefore, the intellectual level is far older by a very long score
    than 3,000 years. How a statement like this can be dropped without any sense
    of irony is staggering.
    DuMB's arrogance is startlingly ludicrous, and only surpassed by his
    inability to deliver one original insigh
     
    dmb says:
    I think I see the theory you're operating with here. You'd rather be hated
    than ignored, right? Nagative attention is better than nothing, huh? You
    figure that if you can't raise my interest with thoughts and questions about
    the MOQ, that the second best thing would to evoke some kind of response by
    throwing out scatological insults. Sorry to disappoint you, but I find your
    attempts at abuse to be just as boring, vague and incoherent as the rest of
    your posts. Yawn!
     
    Yes, obviously, language is more than three thousand years old. Squawnk's
    mistake is the assumption that intellectual values are required in order to
    speak a language. This just isn't so. Language first emerged as part of the
    social level, along with her cousins myth and ritual.
     
    PIRSIG from chapter 30
    "Philosophers usually present their ideas as sprung from "nature" or
    sometimes from"God", but Phadreus thought neither of these was completely
    accurate. The logical order of things which the philosophers study is
    derived from the "mythos".The mythos is the social culture and the rhetoric
    which the culture must invent before philosophy becomes possible. Most of
    this religious talk is nonsense, of course, but nonsense or not, it is the
    PARENT of our modern scientific talk. This "mythos over logos" thesis agreed
    with the MOQ's assertion that intellectual static patterns of quality are
    built up out of social static quality. Digging back into ancient Greek
    history, to the time when this mythos-to logos transition was taking
    place...."
     
      

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 19:19:41 BST