RE: MD The Transformation of Love

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Jun 15 2003 - 20:00:23 BST

  • Next message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"

    Johnny:

    This is a private message. I only wish to scold, not publicly embarrass you.

    dmb said:
    "Since we have the ability to control reproduction and marriage is no longer
    a social or economic necessity, people get married as a matter of choice."

    Johnny replied:
    Actually, there are millions of unintended pregnancies every year, and there

    is still such a thing as economic necessity, so this is a fairly ignorant,
    callous statement. What is really being said here is "now that we give
    women abortions and expect them to support themselves as equals, we don't
    have to care for them or put up with their old-school nagging anymore. We
    can get a younger one whenever we want."

    dmb says:
    Huh? How bizzare! Just because some people don't or won't use contraception
    does not negate the fact that people have the ability. We're talking about
    the changing nature of marriage and relationships, not teen pegnancy. The
    fact that women now have relatively equal access to the job market and such
    does not lead me to conclude that "we don't have to care for them or put up
    with them." I only conclude that women are now freer. They are no longer
    economically trapped or financially dependent. I'm talking about choice,
    about freedom, about the ability to marry for higher reasons, for emotional
    and spiritual fulfillment rather that just the ancient and conventional
    reasons. That's what "is really being said here". How you can construe this
    as "ignorant or callous" is a mystery to me. I mean, there is reading
    between the lines and then there is making up a bunch of bizzare nonsense
    and then putting into my mouth. And this coming from a guy who has never
    been married, from a guy who has actually played a role in destroying a
    marriage!? I think this topic presents you with an excellent opportunity to
    shut up about marriage and morality.

    HYP-O-CRITE noun. 1. A person who pretends to have virtues, moral or
    religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess,
    especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs. 2. a person who
    fiegns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially one whose
    private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 20:00:21 BST