From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Tue Jul 01 2003 - 16:24:06 BST
Skutvik, (for it is he):
Sure, if language is synonymous with the intellectual LEVEL,
everything is intellectual ...or in the mind. But that can't be if the
MOQ is to replace the SOM.
sq: Would placing your head in a microwave oven for 10 mins max power
interfere with your ability to communicate?
Do you feel we should try an experiment to increase the IQ of our children by
dropping them on their heads from, say, shoulder height, as new borns?
Of course not. That juicy gland we call a brain is not to be messed with.
You appear to regard this way of valuing the brain as problematic Skutvik?
You appear to regard valuing the brain as an assertion of SOM. Why?
The brain is a hive of processes - there are no objects anywhere - just
processes mingling with process. Even the postulation that there are only processes
is in a process. Some processes are highly coherent, and aesthetic. Chinese
intellect would make this more clear to you, but you don't know anything about
it do you? Even a second rate philosophy dictionary will tell you that Chinese
intellectual history goes back 4,000 years - and developed in total isolation
from the ancient Greek mythos.
By God you are a stupid man.
There was a time when i actually thought you were intelligent but misguided.
Now, it appears clear you are just plain thick as a brick. I cannot see any
other way to describe it.
squonk
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 01 2003 - 16:24:54 BST