From: johnny moral (johnnymoral@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 02 2003 - 01:55:34 BST
Hi Scott,
>Johnny,
> > I've never been a stickler for legal consistency, I feel that the
> > legistature can make whatever laws it wants, regardless of the "logic"
>or
> > consistency. This court is saying Texas's morals aren't the country's
> > morals, and therefore we will impose the country's morals (or actually,
>the
> > court's elitist cosmopolitian dinner-party media-ready morals).
>
>I believe the court is saying that the morals of a majority of Texans
>should
>not restrict the private actions of a minority of Texans, when those
>private
>actions do not have non-private consequences. It's not about Texas versus
>the rest of the country, but about protecting a minority within Texas.
>
>- Scott
Yes, but as Scalia dissented, all laws do that. And there are great public
consequences, as well as great private consequences. Don't forget that the
public is made up of those private people, so it is impossible for a private
person to do something without effecting the public, since he is part of the
public.
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 02 2003 - 01:56:24 BST