RE: MD Should privacy be a right?

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Jul 06 2003 - 23:37:49 BST

  • Next message: Valence: "Re: MD The Giant (types of patterns/types of people)"

    One more for me too, gents.

    Platt said:
    > You might want to point out where Pirsig said that a right to privacy is
    > an intellectual value. If you can't, you're attributing a position to him
    > that isn't there, just as the Court found a right to sodomy in the
    > Constitution that isn't there.

    Rick replied:
    As I've pointed out to you several times now, the Constitution does
    explicitly say that it is not an exhaustive list of rights, so I can't
    imagine why you still think it's persuasive to keep pointing out that the
    Constitution doesn't contain an explicit right to privacy. The 9th amendment
    + 10th amendment = unenumerated rights that belong to the people as
    individuals. Nobody (no matter how conservative) disputes this!!! The
    debated question is whether privacy is one of those unenumerated rights. Do
    you actually have any arguments that SUPPORT your view that it isn't? Texas
    didn't... Should they have hired you as their lawyer instead? How would you
    have convinced the Court that the framers didn't intend privacy to be
    covered by the 9th amendment? As a great man once wrote, "Show some
    evidence, please, not just your personal bias."

    dmb adds:
    Correct me if I'm wrong here, Rick, but I think the right to privacy has
    been well established in the law. I mean, there is no real dispute that we
    all enjoy the right to privacy, its just a matter of extents and degrees.
    Not only is it a pretty slam dunk winner as one of the "unenumerated
    rights", but the issue has come before the courts and a history of law on
    the matter is now well established. (I believe it was the writings of J.S.
    Mill in the mid-19th century were some of the first, best articlulations on
    the topic.) I can only wonder when the issue first went before the courts
    directly, but I wouldn't be surprized if it were more than cnetury ago.

    Ironic that the one worried about jack-booted thugs and big brotherism is
    the first to line up in support of armed cops in private bedrooms. It makes
    me blush. It really does.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jul 06 2003 - 23:38:36 BST